• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Wage Peace - Disrupt War

Strategic, bold, direct and discursive action to disrupt militarism in Australia and our region.

  • About Us
    • Making Change
    • Wage Peace Wins Global Peace Award 2023
    • Wage Peace, Disrupt War and Repair the Planet!
    • Smashing the Social License of an Industry Geared to Terrorise.
  • Campaigns
    • Disarm Australia
      • Demilitarise Education
        • BAE recruiting Year 6 kids
        • Demilitarise Education – Campaign Background Briefing
        • The military has invaded our classrooms.
        • Interrupting the Pipeline: Defence in STEM
        • Spotlight on UNSW
        • USyd Tied to Arms Industry
        • Demilitarise UQ: A Petition to UQ from an Autonomous Student Group
      • Stop Harms Dealers
        • ABC & Weapons Silence A Speech
        • Blockade Lockheed
        • Australia exports 155mm shell exports to Germany & the IDF.
        • No AUKUS: No Submarines!
        • Boeing is OUT OF CONTROL
          • Boeing, the Pentagon and Australian-based Propaganda Units
          • Boeing is a Weapons Corporation at UQ – Beware Boeing’s Wars
          • Trial of the Boeing Disrupters
        • Conversations with the Arms Dealers: Thales and the first of December
        • EOS – Just one more Merchant of Death
          • Is this justice? EOS arms deals to Saudi Arabia and UAE
        • Nioa Munitions: An excess of public money to fund police and the gun lobby
        • Nioa should rule out exporting weapons to Indonesia
        • Rheinmetall – making a killing
        • Stop Lockheed Martin
      • Legacy Campaigns
        • US out!
          • Fight to ditch the Aus-US Alliance
          • Close Pine Gap Website
          • Signing Up For War: The US Military Agreement With Australia You Probably Know Nothing About
        • Toxic SAS
          • SAS absorbed toxic US military culture
        • Whistleblowers
          • Support McBride – It’s About Exposing War Crimes
    • Frontier Wars
      • Frontier Wars
      • Frontier Wars Ceremonies
      • Boe Spearim’s Fabulous Frontier Wars Podcast – Must Listen!
      • Commemorating the Frontier Wars in Gimuy 2021
      • Frontier Wars – Lest We Forget 2021
      • Frontier Wars’ Desert Pea Wreath
      • Lest We Forget the Frontier Wars 2020 – online gathering
    • Peace In Papua
      • Peace In Papua
      • Peace In Papua – Thales, recall your bombs
      • War on West Papua
      • Make West Papua Safe, Australian Federal Police action
      • West Papua is Rising Up: Act now with Papuans to #MakeWestPapuaSafe
    • Disarm Police
      • Nine hours, no bullets!
      • NIOA – Arming the Intervention
  • Disrupt Land Forces
    • dlf 24
      • Report: Dangerous Policing DLF24
      • Journalist’s take on DLF 2024
      • Tactical Disruption Works
    • dlf 22
      • War Criminals need not apply; a summary of DLF22
      • Disrupt Land Forces 2022
      • Land Forces – A Killer of an Expo
      • Facilitating Exports: The Global Supply Chain and Landforces Brisbane
    • dlf 21
      • We massively disrupted the Land Forces weapons expo
      • Love against the machine – Land Forces 2021
      • Disrupt Land Forces – weapons company tour
  • Resources
    • Weapons Dealers in Australia: A Map
    • Peace Pod: an aural adventure in anti-militarist activism.
      • Get Your Armies Off Our Bodies: Trailer
      • Peace Pod launched!
      • Resources for Students
      • Resources for Teachers
      • Child’s Play? Militarism in the classroom
      • E5 Jangan Bunuh Kami Lagi / Stop Killing Us: West Papua Part 1
      • E6 Jangan Bunuh Kami Lagi / Stop Killing Us: West Papua Part 2
      • E8 We Need These Minds: MIlitarism in Universities
      • Revolving Doors, Corruption Gateways
      • War Stories
      • War Stories: BONUS – Afghan Peace Volunteers
    • References
    • Articles
      • The military industrial complex rides on the glamorous mythology of war
      • Doxxing and Security Culture
      • War = Peak Toxic Masculinity
      • War and Peace- articles by Andy Paine
  • Stop Arming Israel
    • Stop Arming Israel
    • Blockade Bisalloy: A Report from the ‘Gong
      • Bisalloy Makes Steel to Kill
    • F-35 Supply Chain
      • Taking Action Against Ferra and the F35
      • Nupress in the F35 Supply Chain – Newcastle
      • What’s Marand got to do with it?
      • Ferra Engineering, Boeing & the Queensland Government
    • Arms Embargo Now!
      • Nth Qld tungsten burns in Palestine
      • Harms Dealers: Thales in partnership with Israel Aerospace and Elbit.

Disrupt Land Forces

Tactical Disruption Works

I’m guessing that anyone who reads Pearls and Irritations knows that Land Forces, Australia’s largest weapons expo, was held in Melbourne from 11 to 13 September in the face of strong opposition. Given the blanket coverage, it’s likely the great majority of those in the city also knew this was happening, as well as a great many across the country. Going by the coverage by the likes of Al Jazeera and BBC, and feedback we’ve had from Mexico, Indonesia, Colombia, and more, it’s reached plenty of international audiences as well. The country’s largest weapons fair has been well and truly held up to the light.


This was first published on Pearls and Irritations, 20th September, just following the Disrupt Land Forces Expo. Since then there have been some major wins. Written by a close associate of the Wage Peace team it outlines the importance of physical disruption to interrupting the social license of the “Harms Dealers”.


As has the role Victoria’s Labor Government played in supporting and funding this, and the participation of the biggest weapons corporations coming to town to promote and sell instruments of mass slaughter in billion-dollar deals. This includes Israeli corporations, who — from first-hand accounts — were actively highlighting the fact that their equipment has been used on Palestinian civilians, in war crimes, at a time of genocide in Gaza, as part of their sales pitch.

Without the Disrupt Land Forces mobilisation, this level of exposure would not have taken place, and the deals would have gone ahead in a quiet ambience of corporate comfort.

A great many people worked for months to make this happen. Or rather, they worked for years: this is the third Disrupt Land Forces, with previous ones in Brisbane in 2021 and 2022. Those were, in turn, built on sustained practices of direct action fostered over years by multiple movements – peace and anti-militarism, [First Nations justice], environment campaigns, and others in international solidarity. These practices were developed by key groups and individuals who saw Australia’s accelerating militarisation over the last decade and more, and began working in response.

This is not just disruption for effect: in Aotearoa, campaigners used disruption to shut down the weapons expo there, the National Security Forum, in 2019; it hasn’t come back since. Campaigners in the UK have forced the closure of the weapons factories of several Israeli corporations. Back in the 1990s, the AIDEX weapons fair was cancelled in Canberra after a blockade by thousands.

Now, in Melbourne, we closed key streets for four days. We raised the cost for the government, to around $30 million – now they’re considering not holding such an event in the same place again. After disrupting the previous two expos in Brisbane, we have started to shift it out of Victoria as well.

This is a beginning, not an end. Direct action, with exposure as its first step, has a track record.

And we need it. Australia’s new wave of militarisation is profound, and its full scope is perhaps still not properly appreciated. Whether it’s offering increasing stretches of land up north for US troops in their “pivot to Asia” over a decade ago; or aiming to become a top-10 global military weapons exporter; or wholesale subsidising of and subordination to the US military with AUKUS, the scope is immense.

We now have all the biggest multinational weapons corporations setting up shop here, expanding and building the tools for mass killing, and sending both those weapons, and those profits, overseas. Any serious analysis of this business makes clear that profit, not defence — however you define that — is their motive; how can it not be, for listed companies. Even for those with a “defence” world view, this primacy of profit is a fundamental conflict of interest; repeated reports of large-scale corruption, from bribes and fraud all the way through to the endless “revolving door” jobs for mates, highlights the point.

And Gaza. Tearing the mask right off to show what this truly means. The spreading realisation that has grown by day, by week, and by month, of just how deeply integrated Australia is in this genocidal assault. The clear view of the role of weapons corporations, and the support they receive from the state, that makes possible — inevitable — exactly this genocide and others. The war on Gaza is their business model. It’s what they export.

That is why we called for an arms embargo on Israel, and an end to the arms trade. To stop the current genocide, and prevent the next from starting.


In November 2024 the Victorian Government has also pulled out of a partnership, with significant money flow, with Israel weapons dealer Elbit.

Disrupt Land Forces, or DLF, was an invitation to collaborate, with over 50 groups and many individuals joining and taking on their own actions, able to get support from the whole. We had two principles – no harm to living things, and no policing of each other: if you didn’t personally like a particular approach or strategy that others were using, ask them about it rather than judging.

Wednesday, the first day of the expo was dramatic. We gathered to try and physically stop delegates from entering to make their billion-dollar deals, but then had police horses and the riot squad charging us, firing foam bullets and flash grenades, and releasing OC spray sometimes so thick it became a burning pink blanket. News stories hyperventilated about violent protesters injuring police; take a look at the broadcast footage though and almost all you see, is police being violent to us instead.

Funny, that. Anyone up for an inquiry there?

It was a joy, a pleasure, to finally get to oppose this awful weapons fair. It felt good to stand up and say what we were there for. And most of all, it felt wonderful to do this with a large number of people. This was community creation: in between rolling high-energy and often intense actions, we gathered at our base, shared and planned, learned and created; the kitchen crew was celebrated, feeding bodies and souls. And while some of the street actions got the mainstream headlines, in this space, and others like it over previous months, is where we connected and strengthened the very meaning of why we were here.

The DLF launch happened in June, and featured stories from many frontline communities – those forced into confrontation with the military system just to preserve their lands and lives. We heard First Nations stories in Naarm; stories from Palestine; from West Papua, Western Sahara, Iran, the Philippines, Chile, and the Mapuche peoples of southern South America. And while the expo started on Wednesday, our events began on Sunday, with the Peace Fire at Camp Sovereignty in the centre of Naarm. Elders from Victoria and several places across the continent came to tell the truth about the colony’s Frontier Wars, and about the ongoing repression, and resistance, of First Nations people here. Other Peace Fires were lit in West Papua and around this continent, and streamed to us online, their stories also shared.

A chant over months of solidarity with Gaza has been, “we are all Palestinians”. These stories told something of how much that resonates for communities across the world, how many layers of meaning that sentence can hold.

The dramatic headlines are, perhaps, all most people saw, but DLF events were far more varied. A couple of examples: Thursday night one group held a Vigil for Gaza by the river, in which those present wrote the names of children lost to the genocide on small paper kites on display. Friday, we wheeled out a West Papuan canoe, modelled on the one refugees travelled in to get to Australia in 2006, and performed a traditional dance, marking this government’s complicity in and contribution to that ongoing brutal occupation in our near neighbourhood. Friday also closed with several of us dressed up in a zombie dance, mirroring the business of death inside the expo, with others waving Wanted posters of the bosses from weapons corporations like Thales, Boeing, Elbit Systems, Rheinmetall, Lockheed Martin, and more.

In the lead-up to the mobilisation, one of the organisers pointed out how this was a chance for those of us in more privileged positions, to put our own bodies on the line for a change. More than 150 of us were injured, a couple badly enough to need hospital treatment. (Again: inquiry, anyone?) This is serious harm; and yet at an important level the danger for most was still symbolic by comparison: the tear gas and rubber bullets fired at us on Wednesday are a world away from the devastating destruction of Gaza, West Papua, and so many other places under assault. But to do this even in a small way was affirming: a determination to stand with communities whose places have become frontlines because of the very weapons being sold here. Driven by love and by rage, solidarity as an act of care.

Exposure is the first step. We need to take this further. The invitation to join is always open.

Disrupt Land Forces is running an appeal to support those arrested and charged, or fined during the mobilisation.

You can donate here:

Disrupt Land Forces Legal Costs

Interesting Commentary on Land Forces 2024

Media statement: Grossly excessive policing of protesters likely infringed on human rights

11 September 20244 minute read

11 September 2024

Melbourne Activist Legal Support (MALS) fielded a team of 20 independent legal observers to monitor the policing of protests against the Land Forces Exposition between 6.00am and 1.00pm, Wednesday 11 September 2024, at the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC) in Melbourne.

Legal observers witnessed multiple incidents of excessive use of force by police including:

  • OC spray deployed at persons moving away from police lines
  • Rubber bullets deployed at short-range
  • Indiscriminate use of OC spray upon large crowds
  • Use of tear gas, rubber bullets, and flash-bangs against idle persons including persons with hands raised and those attempting to move away from police lines
  • Excessively violent arrests by PORT members
  • PORT members punching people
  • PORT members slamming people’s heads against walls whilst arresting them
  • Riding of horses into crowds resulting in injuries.

MALS noted the chaotic behaviour of many protesters, which included in some circumstances, objects being thrown at or over police lines, yelling and abuse, the setting alight of a bin, and some physical assaults by protesters against attendees attempting to enter the MCEC. The context has been considered in each use-of-force incident noted above. Legal observers noted that in most circumstances, protestor behaviour became heightened after and in response to a coercive crowd control manoeuvre by the police or the use of police weapons.

The behaviour of individual protesters does not justify excessive force against others nor the use of force against entire crowds. The size, nature, or political context of a protest does not change the obligations upon police to act lawfully.

Incidents of excessive force documented today by legal observers may constitute unlawful assault by police.

MALS is currently examining evidence collected to determine infringements under the following international and domestic legal frameworks:

  • The International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
  • The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act (2006)
  • The Victorian Police Manual (VPM);
  • Police powers, legal rights and protections are contained in the Crimes Act (Vic), Victoria Police Act (Vic), the Summary Offences Act (Vic) and common law.

Treatment of medics and legal observers

Legal observers noted police assaulting and OC spraying medics, and obstructing them when attempting to treat injured people.

Police were observed continuing to fire directly at medics as they escorted people away from police lines with OC spray, and tear gas, and charging at them using batons and shields.

The MALS Legal Observer Team itself was subject to gross violation of its independent and internationally recognised role.

On multiple occasions, legal observers, themselves were assaulted, OC sprayed, pushed and grabbed by police.

On one occasion, three MALS legal observers were at a location to safely view injured people in police custody. The observers were grabbed by members of a PORT Evidence Gathering Team and forcibly moved away. Two of these observers were able to return to the area to document injuries and police actions.

MALS had communicated to Victoria Police senior command ahead of the event to remind them of their legal obligations when interacting with protesters and to alert them to the presence of independent legal observer teams during the week of protests.

Quotes attributable to Melbourne Activist Legal Support spokesperson

‘The policing we observed today was so grossly excessive that we struggle to comprehend any legal justification available to defend the violence, misuse of weaponry and mass injury caused by Victoria Police. The size, nature, or political context of a protest does not change Victoria Police’s obligations to act lawfully.’

‘Protesting is an essential function of a healthy democracy, and the Victorian Government must recognise that protest comes in many forms. We urge the Victorian Government to hold their police force accountable for unlawful use of force observed at the Disrupt Land Forces event.’

‘An urgent, independent investigation of today’s policing operation is required. We look forward to submitting our evidence and findings to such an investigation. The increasingly violent culture of protest policing in Victoria must be reversed.’

‘The granting of special powers to police under anti-terrorism laws has clearly been to afford them the ability to violently suppress this protest action with as many resources as they have available. We call on the Victorian Government to withdraw these additional powers immediately.’

‘The violent assaults of legal observers, as well as medics, by Victoria Police, is a serious violation of human rights as it obstructs the legal and medical rights of persons participating in the demonstration as well as the rights of those performing their duties. Legal and medical roles in the context of public demonstration are globally recognised under international law. Victoria Police are not a power unto themselves, and must not act as if they are.’

Background

MALS has been monitoring public order policing for over 13 years and with a network of solicitors, barristers and human rights advocates has extensive experience in analysing policing and human rights.

In July 2024, the United Nations Human Rights Council called upon all States ‘to pay particular attention to the safety and protection of those observing, monitoring and recording protests, including human rights defenders, lawyers, journalists and other media workers, taking into account their specific role, exposure and vulnerability.’

The legal observers present are registered volunteers with the Melbourne Activist Legal Support (MALS). Legal observers are identified by pink, high-visibility vests that are clearly printed with the words “Legal Observer” across the back and a Legal Observer identification card in the front breast pocket.

Important links:

https://mals.au/2024/01/13/oc-spray-legal-info/

https://mals.au/2020/11/25/victoria-police-weapon-id-guide/


Protecting The Merchants Of Death: The Police Effort For Land Forces 2024 – OpEd

September 12, 2024 First Published in the EurasiaReview.com

By Binoy Kampmark

September 11.  Melbourne.  The scene: the area between Spencer Street Bridge and the Batman Park-Spencer Street tram stop. Heavily armed police, with glinting face coverings and shields, had seized and blocked the bridge over the course of the morning, preventing all traffic from transiting through it.  Behind them stood second tier personnel, lightly armed.  Then, barricades, followed by horse mounted police.  Holding up the rear: two fire trucks.

In the skies, unmanned drones hovered like black, stationary ravens of menace.  But these were not deemed sufficient by Victoria Police.  Helicopters kept them company.  Surveillance cameras also stood prominently to the north end of the bridge.

Before this assortment of marshalled force was an eclectic gathering of individuals from keffiyeh-swaddled pro-Palestinian activists to drummers kitted out in the Palestinian colours, and any number of theatrical types dressed in the shades and costumery of death.  At one point, a chilling Joker figure made an appearance, his outfit and suitcase covered in mock blood.  The share stock of chants was readily deployed: “No justice, no peace, no racist police”; “We, the people, will not be silenced.  Stop the bombing now, now, now”.  Innumerable placards condemning the arms industry and Israel’s war on Gaza also make their appearance.  

The purpose of this vast, costly exercise proved elementary and brutal: to defend Land Forces 2024, one of the largest arms fairs in the southern hemisphere, from Disrupt Land Forces, a collective demonised by the Victorian state government as the great unwashed, polluted rebel rousers and anarchists.  Much had been made of the potential size of the gathering, with uncritical journalists consuming gobbets of information from police sources keen to justify an operation deemed the largest since the 2000 World Economic Forum. Police officers from regional centres in the state had been called up, and while Chief Commissioner Shane Patton proved tight-lipped on the exact number, an estimate exceeding 1,000 was not refuted.  The total cost of the effort: somewhere between A$10 to A$15 million. 

It all began as a healthy gathering at the dawn of day, with protestors moving to the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre to picket entry points for those attending Land Forces.  

Over time, there was movement between the various entrances to prevent these modern merchants of death from spruiking their merchandise and touting for offers.  As Green Left Online noted, “The Victorian Police barricaded the entrance of the Melbourne Convention Centre so protestors marched to the back entrance to disrupt Land Forces whilst attendees are going through security checks.” 

In keeping with a variant of Anton Chekhov’s principle, if a loaded gun is placed upon the stage, it is bound to be used.  Otherwise, leave it out of the script.  A large police presence would hardly be worthwhile without a few cracked skulls, flesh wounds or arrests.  Scuffles accordingly broke out with banal predictability.  The mounted personnel were also brought out to add a snap of hostility and intimidation to the protestors as they sought to hamper access to the Convention.  For all of this, it was the police who left complaining, worried about their safety. 

Then came the broader push from the officers to create a zone of exclusion around the building, resulting in the closure of Clarendon Street to the south, up to Batman Park. Efforts were made to push the protests from the convention centre across the bridge towards the park.  This was in keeping with the promise by the Chief Commissioner that the MCEC site and its surrounds would be deemed a designated area over the duration of the arms fair from September 11 to 13.

Such designated areas, enabled by the passage of a 2009 law, vests the police with powers to stop and search a person within the zone without a warrant.  Anything perceived to be a weapon can be seized, with officers having powers to request that civilians reveal their identity.  

Despite such exercisable powers, the relevant legislation imposes a time limit of 12 hours for such areas, something most conspicuously breached by the Commissioner.  But as Melbourne Activist Legal Support (MALS) group remarks, the broader criteria outlined in the legislative regime are often not met and constitute a “method of protest control” that impairs “the rights to assembly, association, and political expression” protected by the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities.

The Victorian government had little time for the language of protest.  In a stunningly grotesque twist, the Victorian Premier, Jacinta Allan, defended those at the Land Forces conference as legitimate representatives of business engaging in a peaceful enterprise.  “Any industry deserves the right to have these sorts of events in a peaceful and respectful way.”  If the manufacture, sale and distribution of weapons constitutes a “peaceful and respectful” pursuit, we have disappeared down the rabbit hole with Alice at great speed.

That theme continued with efforts by both Allan and the opposition leader, John Pesutto, to tarnish the efforts by fellow politicians to attend the protest.  Both fumed indignantly at the efforts of Greens MP Gabrielle de Vietri to participate, with the premier calling the measure one designed for “divisive political purposes.”  The Green MP had a pertinent response: “The community has spoken loud and clear, they don’t want weapons and war profiting to come to our doorstep, and the Victorian Labor government is sponsoring this.”

The absurd, morally inverted spectacle was duly affirmed: a taxpayer funded arms exposition, defended by the taxpayer funded police, used to repel the tax paying protestors keen to promote peace in the face of an industry that thrives on death, mutilation and misery. 

FacebookTwitterEmailFlipboardMastodonLinkedIn

Share

Binoy Kampmark

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

Sign Our Open Letter to Victoria Police

Community Letter on Land Forces Policing 

The Hon. Jacinta Allan, Premier of Victoria,

The Hon. Anthony Carbines MP, Minister for Police,

Shane Patton, Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police,

Luke Cornelius, Assistant Commissioner of Police,

Sean Morrison, Freedom of Information Commissioner,

Supreme Court of Victoria



To All Parties,

We the people, undersigned by allied organisations and collectives, demand an immediate end to Victoria Police’ campaign of strategic incapacitation against the pro-Palestinian and anti-war protest movement in Victoria. A campaign of disinformation, intimidation and repression by Victoria Police has been actively supported by the Victorian Labor Party and major media outlets such as the Herald Sun. We deplore the violent policing that was directed at protesters during the Land Forces expo and demand an Inquiry into the use of projectile and chemical weapons against citizens in this State.

Everyone on the ground and the people watching at home witnessed unprecedented brutality by Victorian and NSW Police on Wednesday September 11th outside the Land forces weapons expo. We support the calls for an independent inquiry into the use of force during Land Forces by the Greens Party of Victoria and Melbourne Activist Legal Service (MALS). We demand a formal acknowledgment of and apology for the many Victoria Police breaches of our human rights, rights protected under the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

The Police were witnessed engaging in contraventions of Part 2 (10) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC), namely a duty to protect any person from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. During Land Forces crowd control operations evidence gathered shows unarmed protestors being subject to extreme physical violence such as trampling by mounted police, assault with OC spray, gun deployment of irritant canisters, rubber bullets or high velocity rounds aimed at upper torsos and faces ⎯ with lethal risk ⎯ and indiscriminate sonic weaponry that has left many with ongoing health problems…. READ MORE-



Incidents of excessive force documented by MALS during Land Forces may constitute unlawful assault by Police. Coercive crowd control manoeuvres by police at Land Forces were observed by MALS to escalate risk, in keeping with findings from the April 2024 IBAC review of OC spray use that “in many cases the decisions and actions of police escalated incidents or increased the safety risk of those involved”. We find police carriage of weaponry during civil society protests to lead to brutality and assault. We demand an end to any armed police presence at protest events.

Over 100 people were injured by Police weapons at Land Forces on September 11th and many more were subjected to tear gas and OC spray, both of which are designated chemical weapons. Of those injured by Police, six required hospitalisation, while others reported they were refused medical care during the arrest process. Community medics were also injured by Police while administering first aid to injured protestors.

Evidence gathered shows many protesters endured police brutality while being detained. This included being beating with batons, dragged, strangled, trampled and OC sprayed in the face during arrest. Part 2 (22) of the Charter of the Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC) clarifies that all persons must be treated humanely when deprived of liberty.

During the Land Forces expo, Police were witnessed to have engaged in contraventions of Part 2, Section (7(3)), Section 12 and Section (16(1)) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC) by invoking the Terrorism (Community Protection) Act 2003. The Terrorism Act is explicitly not to be used to suppress protest, yet Police used powers under the Act to search, detain and remove hundreds of ordinary people speaking out against the Land Forces weapons expo. Victoria Police acknowledged on September 11th that there was “no intelligence to suggest the event was the target of any specific threat“. Protest is a democratic right and cornerstone of democracy. The public is owed an explanation for the apparently extra- judicial use of the Terrorism Act to suppress protest activity.

On Thursday September 12th, a small group of protestors attempted to assemble and resume protest actions at Land Forces, however protesters were subjected to profiling and intimidation, body searches, improper seizure of personal items and arbitrary police threats to ‘move on or be arrested’ . The application of the Terrorism (Community Protection) Act 2003 with respect to peaceful civilians contravenes Section 4 in which advocating, protesting, dissenting or taking industrial action are explicitly not considered terrorist acts where the person doing the activity does not intend to cause serious harm to a person or create a serious risk to public safety. Many protesters attending who held anti-war placards, flags, or wore keffiyehs were allegedly profiled by Police and subjected to arbitrary detention and arrest. This Police behaviour also contravenes Section 2 (21) of the Charter of the Human Rights and  Act 2006 (VIC), namely the right to liberty and security of person(s).

Attempts by Police to manufacture public outrage through publishing the identities of individuals associated with the anti-war movement must cease immediately as a violation of their human rights. We have seen images of our community depicted across newspapers and websites, reversing the presumption of innocence and impinging on the right to hold opinion without interference. This practice breaches (Part 2 (15)) of the Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC). Use of the Police website to publish names and images of anti-war protesters makes those individuals vulnerable to further human rights infringements. Such publications violate Section (13(b)) of the Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC), since individuals have been named in the public domain as criminals before the burden of proof has been met. Police publication of activists’ names and faces when the burden of proof has not been met is an intimidation tactic and must cease.

It is also distressing to see bail conditions used to restrict the human rights of protesters, rights which are protected under the Charter of the Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC) (Part 2 (16)). Bail conditions are intended to i) ensure the accused presents at court and ii) ensure the community, especially witnesses, are not harmed. Yet Police are routinely using bail conditions to limit the freedom of movement, association, assembly and expression of individuals involved with protest activity, despite there being no bail concern.

The practice of dispensing with an individual’s human rights because they are suspected of holding dissenting opinions is patently undemocratic and is a violation of both the Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The Police practice of imposing repressive bail conditions on activists must cease.

We support the calls for an independent inquiry into the Police brutality witnessed at Land Forces. We demand the Government adhere to its obligation to protect and promote the rights of protestors in alignment within the Charter of the Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC). We demand that Police strategic incapacitation operations against our community be withdrawn. This policing strategy is characterised by the deployment of massive police presence, indiscriminate use of force with an array of weapons, ‘preventative’ arrests, restrictive bail conditions, along with unprecedented levels of monitoring and surveillance, which breach individuals’ rights to privacy and may constitute harassment. This overexertion of police powers can be seen as an attempt to dissuade the public from exercising their rights to assembly and expression at protests.

In light of an abundance of evidence clearly showing violent Police misconduct we, the people undersigned, make the following demands of the elected Victorian Government and Police;

• Establish an Independent Inquiry into policing at the Land Forces expo

• Enforce a total ban on police weapons at protests

• Immediately cease publishing names and images of activists suspected of protest- related offences

• End the practice of imposing restrictive bail conditions on individuals charged with low level offences, including common protest-related charges

• Cease monitoring and surveillance operations against ordinary citizens in the anti-war movement

• Ensure that in future citizens are not met with reckless, violent responses from Police whilst exercising their human rights to protest as stated in the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC)

• Prove that the shooting of protesters was approved lawfully, including to the chest and head, and if it was not approved explain why it was not stopped.

• Publicly address the ways in which Police violated the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (VIC) during and after Land Forces 2024

• Share evidence of the terrorist threat that enabled the Chief of Police, Minister of Police, Premier and Supreme Court to grant Police special powers under the Terrorism Act.

• Explain why hundreds of police including PORT and NSW Riot Police had no body cams on, or did not have their body-cams operational, whilst searching, brutalising and arresting protesters.

• Explain why many police had no visible badges or identification numbers on during 11th September operations.




Each member of the Victorian Government and Victorian Police have sworn oaths to protect and promote human rights, and the people undersigned call on each of you to align yourselves with the oaths you have made.


Examples of Police brutality on Sept 11 at the Land Forces expo.

1. 71-year-old man was knocked to the ground when riot police charged towards a group of protesters. There was no ‘provocation’ and no arrest motivation for this police charge. It was an indiscriminate attack intended to move protesters from their (lawfully held) position. The riot police smashed into this elderly man with their shields and then trampled him as they continued their charge. The man sustained multiple bruises and a concussion.
2. A 33-year-old woman stooped to assist an eighty-year-old protester who had been pushed to the ground by police. While the woman was bent over assisting the elderly person, several police beat her about the kidneys and lower back using batons. The woman suffered major bruising and required hospitalisation.

3. A 16-year-old person was tackled around the neck and thrown to the ground, resulting in contusions of the face and skull, concussion and bleeding from the nose and ear. Police then knelt on the young person’s back and forced their face further into the gravel. The young person was arrested and refused medical attention. The person had not committed any offences, they were simply present at the protest.

4. A press photographer was shot in the head by a foam bullet fired by Police, perforating their eardrum and removing part of their ear. Community medics attempting to treat this person were sprayed with OC spray by Police as they attempted to stem the bleeding. Police refused access to emergency workers (ambulance paramedics) who attended to take the injured person to hospital. The injured person was later hospitalised.

5. A young man was held on the ground by Police, with one officer kneeling on his back while another two officers pinned his arms down with their knees. A fourth officer lifted the young person’s head up so that a fifth officer was able to spray OC chemicals directly into the person’s face.

6. A 17-year-old person was arbitrarily arrested and plucked from the crowd for no apparent reason. She reported that arresting officers held her by the throat for several minutes. The girl described the assault as ‘being strangled’. The assault caused her to have difficulty breathing and left bruises on her throat.

7. A young disabled person was arbitrarily arrested and placed in zip-tie handcuffs so tight they caused loss of circulation to the hands. The person was denied medical attention in custody. Six weeks later the bruising is still visible.

8. More than two dozen people were diagnosed with concussion resulting from Police use of Flashbang Grenades

#ProtectProtest

Repression of activism is escalating

The past two years have seen laws passed in NSW, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia specifically aimed at criminalising civil society actors who engage in protest to protect forests, waterways and our climate. Undemocratic legislation has given police even more power to close down democratic space. Policing in Western Australia and NSW has been particularly repressive, with activists facing counter-terror police squads and inflated charges for ordinary, non violent protest activity.

The repression of activism we are facing is everybody’s business. When people are charged with ‘conspiracy to commit an offence’ just for thinking about protesting, and then face a year of ‘non association’ conditions, meaning that they are prohibited from communicating with their friends or community, we have a crisis of repression on our hands.

Now Wage Peace has been targeted by the NSW police, after we disrupted a weapons dealers luxury cruise. Read our story here:

The protest at King’s Wharf, Gadigal country

Our friends disrupted the arms dealers at the cash-for-ministerial-contact schmooze fest on the eve of the Indo Pacific weapons expo in Gadi / Sydney. 

Banners were held. Truths were told. Bodies were used to stop the AMDA events managers from whacking and pushing people. #StopArmingIsrael #StopBombingGaza. Stop taking tens of billions a year from Australian taxpayers and giving it to private weapons corporations. We need everything we’ve got right now for #EarthcareNotWarfare.

 

Statement from Wage Peace

Regarding the resistance that was live streamed from Wage Peace social media accounts on the night of Monday the 6th of November 2023:

The action on Monday night was a non harmful act of resistance to the weapons trade, which is currently profiting from the siege on Gaza. The intention of the action was to draw attention to the fact that there are corporations and individuals in this world who profit from the sale of weapons, and thus have a vested interest in the continuation and escalation of armed conflicts around the world. The scale of the destruction currently being wrought on Palestinian people warrants a response from the general public, and our response was to draw attention to the corporate actors who benefit from genocide, being obliged as they are to maximise returns for their shareholders.

We non-violently disrupted a group of arms dealers as they boarded their dinner cruise, organized in connection with the Indo-Pacific Naval Exposition. This involved standing in their path as they attempted to board the Starship Sydney. Many of the arms dealers being prevented from boarding their cruise became aggressive toward us, and can be seen on the live stream videos pushing, shoving, and sometimes punching our people. Some of our people had to leave the protest space out of concern for their safety, including one person who was experiencing dizziness after being punched in the head. Before the passengers began boarding, some of the cruise organisers approached the people with megaphones and hit/ripped them out of their hands. Our people did not retaliate, because the intention of the gathering was to take a principled stance against genocide and call for a ceasefire. We went to King Street Wharf to bring our message directly to the employees of the companies that arm the Israeli Defence Forces.

At the time of writing, eight people have been arrested and charged in connection with this act of non-violent resistance, and have been given five charges, most notably unlawful assembly. An element of the unlawful assembly charge is the intent to use violence. At the time of arrest we were holding banners and chanting – ordinary protest activity. This comes as part of an ongoing and deliberate strategy by the NSW police to conflate non-compliance and disobedience with the intention to cause harm. We emphatically reject the accusation of intent to harm. In our resistance we impose only two rules on our allies and associates, the first of which is to do no physical harm to living beings.  This is evidenced in our invitation to Disrupt Land Forces 2021 and 2022, and our invitation to Disrupt Sea Forces 2023, all of which are available on our website. Furthermore, once we were formally issued a move on direction, everyone moved on and left the area.

The NSW Police are out of control, and their response to civil resistance is disproportionate, heavy handed, and a total waste of policing resources.

Strategic Incapacitation

Policing of disruptive protest follows a pattern. The pattern begins with the characterization of protest activity as ‘unlawful’ and ‘violent’, through the conflation of an act of non-compliance with an intent to cause harm. There is no such thing as ‘unlawful protest’. Individuals might break laws while at a protest, but the act of protest itself is never unlawful. The growing use of the concept of ‘unlawful protest’ and the construction of ‘non-compliance’ as ‘violence’ creates space for unwarranted arrests. Once arrested, people are treated as though absolutely guilty. Police routinely apply inflated charges. With the inflated charges come onerous bail conditions and increased surveillance of civil society actors. Their strategy is to lay serious, inflated charges, then use the seriousness of the charges to impose bail conditions which effectively prevent people from participating in political activity. They then continuously adjourn the case to keep people on those bail conditions for as long as possible. The intention behind this strategy is to take people out of social movements, and break the network of relationships that sustain social movements. This is achieved through excessive non-association conditions, restrictions on a person’s movement and where they may reside, excessive reporting conditions that prevent people from travelling to participate in resistance, and heavy surveillance and targeted policing of individuals they have identified as participants.

We assert that the violence caused by the defence contracts held by the companies represented on the cruise that we disrupted is the issue that needs to be addressed. The Australian Defence Export Office has issued 322 export permits to Israel in the last six years, and weapons companies around the world continue to flout human rights agreements by arming Israel with full knowledge of the atrocities their products will be used to commit. Our act of resistance was a refusal to stand by as a genocide unfolds before our eyes.

We assert that the NSW police are more interested in protecting the property rights than human rights. Either those of the Palestinian people being indiscriminately bombed by a military power, or those of the people on this continent who seek to resist and disrupt state sanctioned violence in whatever ways they have available to them.  

The police are currently deploying sophisticated equipment, technologies, and practices to protect arms dealers from the people calling for a ceasefire.

We assert that the real violence has been, and continues to be, perpetrated by the global weapons trade, and the security forces who protect it. We are, and have always been, a non-violent network committed to a world where everyone has the ability to love, be loved, be safe, be respected, and be free. From Western Sydney to West Papua to the West Bank, we demand a ceasefire.

 

… [Read more] #ProtectProtest

Wage Peace Wins Global Peace Award 2023


Global anti-war organisation World Beyond War announces that Wage Peace has won the 2023 Global War Abolisher of the Year

August 28, 2023

World BEYOND War enthusiastically presents the Organizational War Abolisher of 2023 award to Wage Peace Australia. This organization is a leading global inspiration to many peace-related campaigns, including those working to close down giant arms fairs. Wage Peace Australia accurately describes its approach: “We jump on tanks, blockade weapons factories, occupy arms dealers’ offices and reclaim military bases as well as engaging in public discourse and other more conventional campaign methods.”

Please – we encourage you to watch the presentation video here. The 2023 War Abolisher Awards are on the website at https://worldbeyondwar.org/war-abolisher-awards/ .

Wage Peace Australia’s campaign to disrupt the largest weapons bazaar in Australia, the Land Forces International Land Defence Exposition, has been so successful that the arms fair will no longer return to Brisbane. It will, of course, likely be held in a different city, but if people learn from the nonviolent, educational, disruptive activism used in Brisbane, then this arms fair and every other one could be chased out of every location on the planet, leaving those whom Wage Peace Australia refers to as “Harms Dealers” nowhere to do their harming. Zelda Grimshaw, one of the coordinators of the Disrupt Land Forces mobilization, paid tribute to the communitarian spirit underlying this success:

“Wage Peace is proud to be part of a powerful community of resistance to militarism in Australia, and we are proud of the generative role we play in that community. This award recognises Wage Peace’ creative initiative in disrupting the Land Forces weapons expo. We are thrilled to accept the War Abolisher of the Year Award on behalf of the hundreds of peace-loving humans who answered our call to drive weapons companies out of Brisbane. We are grateful for the support of First Nations elders in this struggle. We are grateful for the global community connected through World Beyond War. 

Now let’s cancel those nuke subs.“

Wage Peace is also involved with a campaign to resist the involvement of weapons companies in Australian education. Currently underway is a Wage Peace podcast: “Get Your Armies Off Our Bodies.” The podcast offers an accessible and fresh look a the weapons industry in Australia, presenting militarism through the eyes of Wage Peace people and their friends.

Wage Peace Australia works with peace groups in West Papua, and has helped World BEYOND War to do the same. Wage Peace Australia created the War on West Papua website. Wage Peace Australia is known for its selfless work in collaboration with other organizations. It needs to be known to a broader world.

Wage Peace Australia’s educational and activist endeavours are explicitly aimed at abolishing war, and its members do outstanding work on demilitarizing security and building a culture of peace, two pillars of World BEYOND War’s strategy for creating a global security system free of the scourge of war.

Wage Peace Australia’s Margie Pestorius, in accepting this award, said

We view people-powered disruptive action as being key to shifting the value base and bringing ordinary people into engagement on militarism, defence, war, international relations, and foreign affairs discourses.

We recognise and commemorate the Frontier Wars which rolled out across Australia from 1800 to 1930. We support people-to-people events and ceremonies that respond to the horrific violence inflicted by the British military with settler communities over 140 years. We acknowledge the strong, organised resistance of First Nations peoples in this land.

World BEYOND War is a global nonviolent movement, founded in 2014, to end war and establish a just and sustainable peace. The purpose of the awards is to honor and encourage support for those working to abolish the institution of war itself. With the Nobel Peace Prize and other nominally peace-focused institutions so frequently honoring other good causes or, in fact, wagers of war, World BEYOND War intends its awards to go to educators or activists intentionally and effectively advancing the cause of war abolition, accomplishing reductions in war-making, war preparations, or war culture. World BEYOND War received hundreds of impressive nominations. The World BEYOND War Board, with assistance from its Advisory Board, made the selections.

The awardees are honored for their body of work directly supporting one or more of the three segments of World BEYOND War’s strategy for reducing and eliminating war as outlined in the book A Global Security System, An Alternative to War. They are: Demilitarizing Security, Managing Conflict Without Violence, and Building a Culture of Peace.

DCIM\100MEDIA\DJI_0262.JPG
DCIM\100MEDIA\DJI_0819.JPG
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

info@wagepeaceau.org

tel: 0403214422

SIGN UP DONATE
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • About Us
  • Campaigns
  • Disrupt Land Forces
  • Resources
  • Stop Arming Israel

Copyright © 2026 Wage Peace